Received: from relay7.UU.NET (relay7.UU.NET [192.48.96.17]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id SAA03360 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 18:57:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay7.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzthf10052; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 18:56:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA28993; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 18:55:52 -0500
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 18:55:52 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <199512082351.SAA12425@bort.mv.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Mark Thompson <mark@fusion.mv.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: OFFTOPIC : Gamer Demo Reels
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
> Yep - your right Mark, and yes, we too are looking into motion capture..
I'd be curious to know what you guys decide to use. We have been hedging
toward optical because I have found the sensor based systems too noisey
and prone to goofy motion (like feet that dangle haphazardly).